Skip to main content
Glama
RitikaxG

commerce-ops-mcp

by RitikaxG

AI-First Commerce Operations Investigator

A remotely hosted TypeScript MCP that helps a commerce operations specialist answer one bounded question:

Why has this paid order not reached shipment creation?

The workflow collects synthetic order, payment, inventory, fulfilment, event, and shipment evidence; checks whether that evidence is complete and coherent; applies deterministic TypeScript rules; persists an immutable investigation and audit trail; and can create a human-review escalation. It recommends a next step but never changes commerce state.

Live review

Surface

Value

Health

https://commerce-mcp.ritikaxg.co.in/health

MCP

https://commerce-mcp.ritikaxg.co.in/mcp

Transport

Streamable HTTP

Authentication

Authorization: Bearer <reviewer-token> supplied privately

Availability window

Through at least 9 August 2026, or until review is complete

Start here:

Demo video: Watch the 4–5 minute hosted MCP workflow demo

Related MCP server: commerce-operations-mcp

Product workflow

Hosted MCP architecture and deterministic investigation workflow

The model is used only for natural-language interaction, approved tool selection, and explanation of validated server results. It does not create business facts, calculate diagnosis, select an arbitrary queue, or mutate commerce data.

Why MCP is central

  • The AI host reaches the workflow through Streamable HTTP MCP, not through workflow or database imports.

  • Tool schemas define the complete capability surface and reject unsupported fields.

  • Tool descriptions explain side effects, identifiers, and safe retry behavior.

  • The server returns versioned structured results and finite safe errors.

  • MCP Inspector, Gemini CLI, the direct evaluator, and the model-backed host use the same /mcp contract.

  • The deterministic MCP remains usable when the external model provider is unavailable.

Exact MCP tool surface

Tool

Purpose

Operations write

Commerce write

list_demo_cases

Discover the approved synthetic cases

No

No

investigate_order_exception

Collect evidence, diagnose, and persist the investigation

Yes

No

create_human_review_escalation

Create or reuse a server-derived human-review case

Yes

No

get_review_case

Read a persisted review case and source investigation

No

No

get_investigation_trace

Read the investigation, immutable evidence, and ordered audit events

No

No

Investigation and escalation write workflow records only. The MCP exposes no order update, inventory reservation, warehouse reassignment, fulfilment retry, shipment creation, SQL, reset, or unrestricted HTTP tool.

Data and safety boundary

commerce schema - runtime SELECT only
- orders and order items
- payments
- warehouses and source-specific inventory observations
- fulfilments and fulfilment events
- shipments

operations schema - scoped workflow writes
- investigations
- immutable evidence snapshots
- human-review escalations
- idempotency records
- append-only audit events

The running API uses a restricted PostgreSQL role and cannot insert, update, or delete commerce records. Every investigation and escalation response states commerceStateChanged=false.

Approved synthetic scenarios

Order

Evidence

Expected outcome

Human-review queue

ORD-1042

Complete

Assigned warehouse out of stock; WH-B is eligible

FULFILMENT_OPERATIONS

ORD-1043

Complete

Fulfilment creation failed

FULFILMENT_OPERATIONS

ORD-1044

Complete

Within expected processing time

None

ORD-1045

Complete

Shipment-label creation failed

SHIPPING_OPERATIONS

ORD-1046

Missing

NEEDS_MORE_INFO; no diagnosis

OPERATIONS_DATA_REVIEW

ORD-1047

Complete

Shipment already exists

None

ORD-1048

Complete

Cause not determined

GENERAL_COMMERCE_OPERATIONS

ORD-1049

Complete

Payment not confirmed

PAYMENT_OPERATIONS

ORD-1050

Conflicting

NEEDS_MORE_INFO; no diagnosis

OPERATIONS_DATA_REVIEW

The fixtures use a fixed reference time and contain no real customer data. See the approved scenario contract.

Verification summary

Verification layer

Result

Static and regression CI

PASS

Direct protocol-level MCP evaluation

PASS

All nine synthetic scenarios

PASS

Hosted provider-independent MCP verification

PASS

Hosted model-backed verification

PASS

MCP Inspector

PASS

Gemini CLI as an independent MCP-compatible AI client

PASS

Hosted-safe database verification

3 pass, 0 fail

Runtime credential isolation

PASS

Commerce state unchanged

PASS

MCP Inspector: exact five-tool discovery

MCP Inspector showing the exact five approved tools

Hosted workflow: grounded investigation result

MCP Inspector showing the persisted ORD-1042 investigation result

Automated hosted model-backed evaluation

Hosted model-backed evaluation result

Independent MCP-compatible AI client

Gemini CLI using the hosted MCP to answer the order investigation

The complete sequence, including the authenticated Inspector setup and investigation input, is documented in the Reviewer guide and evidence index.

Important tradeoffs and limitations

  • Deterministic diagnosis: results are testable and auditable, but adding a diagnosis requires a reviewed code change.

  • Immutable decision-time evidence: newer source evidence is evaluated through a new investigation rather than rewriting history.

  • No automatic operational fix: the workflow stops at a recommendation and optional human-review case.

  • Sequential Gemini requests: reduces free-tier rate-limit pressure but increases latency and limits throughput.

  • Bounded retries: exhausted daily or project quota still returns a provider error.

  • Shared reviewer bearer token: suitable for a bounded review window, not individual production identity.

  • Single EC2 and PostgreSQL deployment: intentionally simple and continuously available, but without automated failover.

  • Synthetic fixed dataset: repeatable for evaluation, not a production commerce integration.

  • No frontend: reviewers interact through MCP Inspector or an MCP-compatible AI client.

Documentation

Final submission checklist

  • Hosted MCP URL

  • Source repository

  • Concise README

  • Product decisions, assumptions, and exclusions

  • Focused tests and runtime verification

  • MCP Inspector verification

  • MCP-compatible AI-client verification

  • AI worklog

  • Reviewer token-sharing process

  • Four-to-five-minute demo video

F
license - not found
-
quality - not tested
B
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • AI agent run monitoring with incident replay and SLA receipts.

  • Policy review and purchase discovery for AI-agent commerce actions.

  • Human-as-a-Service for AI agents. Delegate tasks that need a real human, get results via API.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RitikaxG/commerce-ops-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server