commerce-ops-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@commerce-ops-mcpInvestigate why order 1001 hasn't been shipped."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
AI-First Commerce Operations Investigator
This repository will implement a bounded operations workflow that explains why a paid order has not reached shipment creation and can create a persistent human-review escalation.
Current state
Phases 0 and 1 are complete. The PostgreSQL schema proposal was accepted on 2026-07-30 and is now the database implementation source of truth. Phase 2 is the next permitted phase and must start in a separate coding session with its own prompt.
The user removed apps/docs and initialized a Prisma skeleton in packages/db. The Prisma schema remains empty. No accepted Phase 1 entity, migration, application workflow, AI behavior, or MCP implementation exists in code yet.
Related MCP server: Datashift MCP Server
Plan and working instructions
Phase 1 was a documentation-only client-review gate. Its schema is accepted; no Prisma model or migration was created. Use only the Phase 2 prompt in the next coding session and stop at its review gate.
Implementation status
Phase | Status | Main output | Evaluation |
0 | Complete | Workflow contract and repository rules | |
1 | Complete | ||
2 | Not started | Bun and Turborepo foundation | Not created |
3 | Not started | Zod contracts and synthetic scenarios | Not created |
4 | Not started | Approved PostgreSQL schema and seed | Not created |
5 | Not started | Repositories and read-only commerce boundary | Not created |
6 | Not started | Evidence collection and normalization | Not created |
7 | Not started | Evidence readiness and conflict gate | Not created |
8 | Not started | Deterministic diagnosis and suggested action | Not created |
9 | Not started | Persistent investigation and escalation workflow | Not created |
10 | Not started | Standard remote MCP server | Not created |
11 | Not started | Agent behavior and LLM evaluations | Not created |
12 | Not started | Trace APIs and minimal Tailwind viewer | Not created |
13 | Not started | Hardening, deployment, and submission evidence | Not created |
Verified commands
Phase 0 verified the current workspace with:
bunx prettier --check AGENTS.md README.md docs/**/*.mdbun run --filter @repo/ui check-typesbun run --filter @repo/ui build:componentsbun run check-typesbun run --filter @repo/ui lintbun run lint
The desktop shell required /Users/ritikagupta/.bun/bin on PATH. The first root typecheck exposed a starter prerequisite: @repo/ui must be built before the apps can resolve its generated dist exports. The typecheck passed after that package-level build.
See the Phase 0 evaluation report for expected and actual results. No migrate, seed, reset, development, evaluation-harness, or runtime workflow command exists or was claimed for this documentation-only phase.
Phase 1 checks passed for required schema tokens/ER references, client-summary consistency, Markdown formatting, whitespace, unchanged packages/db, and absence of migrations. Mermaid CLI was unavailable, so the ERD received manual syntax review. Full results are in the Phase 1 evaluation report.
No Prisma model, generation, validation, migration, or database command was run.
Plan-intake checks completed:
pdfinfo docs/plans/Diligence_AI_Commerce_Operations_Final_Plan_Updated.pdf- 13 pages, PDF 1.7, unencrypted.shasum -a 256 docs/plans/Diligence_AI_Commerce_Operations_Final_Plan_Updated.pdf-cccc22a5bf3ffae29364c5be78c8b26ed9a2f89c6501fb9cc3abffcbb741d802, matching the supplied source file.
Demo cases
These are planned synthetic scenarios, not implemented fixtures.
Order | Scenario | Expected result |
| Assigned warehouse out of stock |
|
| Fulfilment creation failed |
|
| Within expected processing window |
|
| Shipment label creation failed |
|
| Missing inventory evidence |
|
| Shipment already exists |
|
| Cause not determined |
|
| Source does not confirm payment |
|
| Conflicting inventory evidence |
|
Safety guarantee for this prototype
The intended runtime exposes no commerce-state mutation capability. Operational commerce data is read-only. Allowed writes are limited to investigations, immutable evidence snapshots, human-review escalations, idempotency records, and append-only audit events.
This is currently a documented boundary, not yet an implemented or tested guarantee. Phase reports and guardrail tests must provide the evidence as implementation proceeds.
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- Alicense-qualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate backend incidents by executing runbooks that gather evidence from observability and storage systems.Last updated79MIT

Datashift MCP Serverofficial
Alicense-qualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to submit tasks for human or AI review and receive decisions via MCP tools, adding human review checkpoints to workflows.Last updatedMIT- Alicense-qualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage a customer-support inbox with guardrails, including replying safely, handling escalations, and leveraging upsell opportunities for e-commerce stores.Last updatedMIT
- Flicense-qualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate and resolve operational exceptions across orders, payments, inventory, and fulfillment through a multi-system truth and guarded actions.Last updated
Related MCP Connectors
AI agent run monitoring with incident replay and SLA receipts.
Human-as-a-Service for AI agents. Delegate tasks that need a real human, get results via API.
Turns vague automation requests into tool stacks, prompts, QA checks, and human boundaries.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RitikaxG/commerce-ops-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server