getusers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Gets all users' but fails to mention pagination behavior, authentication requirements, rate limits, or what 'all users' means when filters are applied. The minimal description provides insufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely concise (one sentence) with no unnecessary words. However, it may be too short to be helpful; still, it front-loads the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 optional parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain pagination behavior, default page/take values, or the outcome when all users are requested. An agent would need more context to use this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema—it does not explain how parameters interact (e.g., that `id` filters to one user, or pagination defaults).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Gets all users in an account' using a specific verb and resource. It implies a list operation, which distinguishes it from `getuserbyid` (single user) among siblings. However, the promise of 'all users' conflicts with optional filters (id, page, take), slightly confusing the scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like `getuserbyid` or pagination tools. No explicit conditions or exclusions are stated, leaving the agent to infer usage context from the name and siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.