deletemedia
Delete a specific media asset from your digital signage system by using its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete media asset.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a specific media asset from your digital signage system by using its unique ID.
Delete media asset.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., irreversibility, required permissions, cascading effects). For a destructive operation, this is a critical omission.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short (3 words), which is efficient but at the cost of necessary information. It fails to provide sufficient detail to be considered well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and a single undocumented parameter, the description is grossly incomplete. It omits crucial details about side effects, return values, prerequisites, and scope.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single required parameter 'id' is not described at all. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving the agent to guess what 'id' refers to.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('media asset'), making the purpose immediately apparent. However, it does not differentiate from sibling delete tools like 'deletemediagroup', leaving some ambiguity about the exact scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'deletemediagroup' or other deletion tools. The description lacks context for appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RevelDigital/reveldigital-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server