rbac__get_all_access

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses gzipped response handling, which is beyond schema. No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It does not mention authentication, rate limits, or the structure of the response (though output schema exists).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is brief with three sentences. Some repetition between first and second sentences, but overall concise and front-loaded with the main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present, description doesn't need to detail return values. It covers the core purpose and gzip behavior. Lacks mention of pagination despite limit/offset parameters, but not critical given schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter described. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool gets access information for all Red Hat insights applications. The verb 'Get' and resource 'access information for all Red Hat insights applications' are specific, and no sibling tool competes directly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage context: 'Use this when you need to see access permissions across all applications.' However, it does not mention when not to use it or alternatives, but given no sibling rbac tools, it's adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.