Skip to main content
Glama

get_robot_status

Check the operational status of all connected robots to monitor their availability and functionality within the NWO Robotics system.

Instructions

Get status of all connected robots

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The `getRobotStatus` method handles the `get_robot_status` MCP tool by making an HTTP POST request to the robotics API.
    async getRobotStatus() {
      const response = await axios.post(
        `${API_BASE}/api-robotics.php`,
        { action: 'get_agent_status' },
        { headers: { 'X-API-Key': API_KEY } }
      );
      
      return {
        content: [
          {
            type: 'text',
            text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2),
          },
        ],
      };
    }
  • The input schema and description for the `get_robot_status` tool defined in `ListToolsRequestSchema`.
    {
      name: 'get_robot_status',
      description: 'Get status of all connected robots',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {},
      },
    },
  • server.js:182-183 (registration)
    The tool `get_robot_status` is registered and routed to `this.getRobotStatus()` within the `CallToolRequestSchema` handler.
    case 'get_robot_status':
      return await this.getRobotStatus();
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions retrieving status but doesn't specify whether this is a read-only operation, what permissions are required, how frequently it can be called, or what format the status information returns. This leaves significant gaps for a tool that interacts with connected hardware.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It's perfectly front-loaded and every word earns its place, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that retrieves status from connected robots (potentially complex hardware interactions), the description is inadequate. With no annotations, no output schema, and minimal behavioral context, it doesn't provide enough information about what 'status' includes, how results are structured, or important operational constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already fully documents the absence of inputs. The description appropriately doesn't waste space discussing parameters, maintaining focus on the tool's purpose. A baseline of 4 is appropriate for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('Get') and resource ('status of all connected robots'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_agent_info' or 'query_sensors' that might also retrieve status-related information, preventing a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_agent_info' or 'query_sensors', nor does it mention prerequisites or context for usage. It simply states what the tool does without indicating appropriate scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RedCiprianPater/mcp-server-robotics'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server