Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to keeping-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Automatically tracks AI-assisted work sessions, code changes, and commands in Claude Code or Codex CLI, and provides daily stats, weekly reports, and data export through MCP tools.
      23 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables time tracking and invoicing through natural conversation with MCP clients like Claude or ChatGPT, allowing users to log work hours, query unbilled time, and draft invoices, with a minimal web app for settings, CSV import, and Stripe-powered billing.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local, UI-less timesheet application served via MCP, letting AI assistants log hours, correct entries, generate monthly reports, and compute Finnish-holiday-aware working-time math for invoicing.
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource or action, but there is some overlap: keeping_add_entry and keeping_start_timer both create time entries, and keeping_timer_status overlaps with keeping_list_entries as a read surface. The detailed descriptions and dry-run gates help an agent disambiguate, but the boundaries are slightly fuzzy.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a keeping_ prefix and use snake_case, with clear action_object names like add_entry, delete_entry, and stop_timer. The main inconsistency is that resource listers are split between noun-only names (keeping_organisations, keeping_projects, keeping_tasks) and verb-based names (keeping_list_entries), while keeping_timer_status is neither a verb pattern nor a simple resource name.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well within the target range and maps cleanly to the server's purpose: identity and org context, resource lookups, time-entry CRUD, and timer lifecycle. Each tool has a clear role, with no obvious filler or redundant duplicates.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the core Keeping workflows: list/create/update/delete time entries, start/stop/resume timers, and resolve org/project/task context. It also handles feature-fag disables and provides dry-run previews for destuctive and mutating operations, so agents do not hit dead ends. Missing write access to projects/tasks is not an obvious gap for a time-tracking MCP server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues