alterlab_list_beta_features

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description transparently states it lists features and opt-in state, implying read-only behavior. Does not disclose performance or rate limits, but sufficient for safe use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with key action and result. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters and no output schema, the description fully covers what the tool does and its output (list with opt-in state). Refers to sibling for next action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. Description adds nothing about parameters, but baseline 4 is appropriate for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists all public beta and GA features with opt-in state, using specific verb 'list' and resource 'features'. It differentiates from sibling 'alterlab_enable_beta_feature' by mentioning that tool for opting in.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: use to view features and opt-in state, and suggests 'alterlab_enable_beta_feature' for opting in. Does not explicitly contrast with 'alterlab_list_my_beta_features', but overall guidance is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.