alterlab_batch_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses return behavior with status values and when results are returned. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden; it covers the key behaviors for a polling tool, though it doesn't explicitly state non-destructiveness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences that are well-structured, front-loading the purpose and then providing status values and results. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately covers usage, status values, and result content. No output schema, but the description explains what to expect. For a simple polling tool with one parameter, this is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (batch_id) with 100% schema description coverage. The tool description reinforces that the batch_id comes from alterlab_batch, but adds no new semantic detail beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (poll) and resource (status and results of a submitted batch), and it distinguishes from siblings by specifying that this is to be used after alterlab_batch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to call after alterlab_batch, providing clear usage context. Does not mention when not to use or alternatives, but the context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.