List my farms
list_my_farmsList all farms that the user has access to
Instructions
List all farms that the user has access to
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_my_farmsList all farms that the user has access to
List all farms that the user has access to
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
readOnlyHint=true already tells the agent this is a safe read. The description usefully adds the permission-scope detail ('farms that the user has access to'), but says nothing about pagination, result size, or ordering.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single short sentence with no wasted wording, and the scope qualifier is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter read-only list tool with annotations covering the safety profile and no output schema, the description is nearly sufficient. A brief note on return contents or pagination would close the remaining gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. There is nothing for the description to clarify beyond scope, which it already covers.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description gives a specific verb ('List') and resource ('farms') and scopes it to 'farms that the user has access to'. It is clearly distinct from the singular get_farm, though it does not explicitly name or contrast that sibling.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use context, no mention of alternatives like get_farm or set_default_farm, and no stated purpose for listing (e.g., discovering farm IDs). Usage is only implied by the verb.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.