Skip to main content
Glama
Ranch.Bot MCP Server

Ranch.Bot MCP Server

Official
by RanchBot

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ranch.Bot MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to import, query, edit, audit, and export local personal records through schema-driven MCP tools while masking sensitive fields by default.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a local-first, evidence-backed ledger for physical property, enabling agents to search inventory, prepare capture reviews, and inspect proposals through MCP. Enforces strict boundaries: scoped reads by default, with private write access limited to preparing, not applying, mutations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to query and analyze a local Samsung Health mirror, with tools for status, metadata, inventory, daily summaries, and aggregate analyses, plus optional bounded access to raw records and cloud synchronization.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to query a local MoneyWiz SQLite database through a permanently read-only, local-first interface with Decimal-safe per-currency results for accounts, transactions, categories, payees, tags, budgets, scheduled transactions, and cashflow summaries.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous multi-agent workflows to capture, preserve, and retrieve immutable transcripts and atomic memory cards through a local MCP server, providing tools for forensic search, topic mapping, and structured fact access without losing context fidelity.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 82 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Descriptions work hard to separate overlapping tools, but the set still has genuinely confusable clusters: three EID lookups (lookup_animal_by_eid, find_or_create_animal_by_eid, and the deprecated find_animal_by_identifier), two parallel birth-recording routes (preview_birth_event/confirm_birth_event vs preview_workflow/commit_workflow with amend_birth), and create_record vs create_traceability_event for similar dated events. get_birth_source_evidence vs get_birth_history_evidence and farm_archive's multiplexed list/status/create/cancel/download add further selection risk.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_animals, create_record, update_location, archive_location). Deviations are minor and readable: farm_archive uses noun_verb order and bundles five operations into one name, and a few tools are noun-only (traceability_report, recent_transport_suggestions) with no verb.

    Tool Count2/5

    82 tools is far beyond the 25+ threshold and includes redundancy (a deprecated alias, two birth submission pipelines, multiple near-duplicate evidence readers). The livestock domain is broad, but the surface still feels bloated rather than each tool earning its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is deep and largely full-lifecycle: animals, groups, locations, records, traceability events, births, chute sessions, rations/feedings, imports, workflow templates, tasks, and protocols all have read/write/archive paths. Minor gaps exist, e.g. list_memories has no corresponding create/delete memory tool in the surface, and rations/feedings/chute sessions lack delete operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues