Gauntlet
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| quick_checkA | Fast second look at something small: a function, a regex, a query, a config value, a one-file change. Cheap and quick; use it often. Read-only. |
| codex_reviewA | Adversarial review of a diff or a few files by Codex. Use after any non-trivial change. Returns a verdict and ranked findings with file:line, each checked against the files. Read-only. |
| gemini_reviewB | Second review by Gemini, strongest on interface contracts, error paths, state and user-facing regressions. Read-only. |
| codex_diagnoseA | Root cause of a bug or failing test. Call it as soon as your first hypothesis fails; give it the symptom, the error output and the few files involved. Read-only. |
| gemini_analyzeB | How a broad or unfamiliar part of the code fits together. Use before editing code you have not read. Read-only. |
| security_auditA | Exploitable issues: injection, authorization gaps, secrets, SSRF, path traversal, races, trust of client input. Use on auth, payments, user input, file paths, shell commands. Read-only. |
| edge_casesA | Inputs and states the code mishandles, phrased as test cases. Use after writing logic with branches, parsing, dates, money or retries. Read-only. |
| plan_critiqueA | Critique of an implementation plan before any code is written: wrong assumptions, missing steps, simpler paths, production risks. Use on any task that touches more than one file. Read-only. |
| councilA | The same question to Codex, Gemini and GPT-OSS in parallel, merged: each verdict, the findings two or more families agree on (the strongest signal), and where they disagree. Use for risky changes, security-sensitive code or a design you are unsure of. Read-only. |
| gauntlet_statusA | Which CLIs are installed and signed in, which model each tier uses, which models are paused after failures, and the limits in force. Call it after a failed call. Never shows credentials. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as status, quick check, security audit, edge cases, and plan critique. However, codex_review, gemini_review, and council overlap in the review space, and an agent might be unsure when to use a single-model review versus the multi-model council, despite the descriptions offering guidance.
All names use snake_case, which is consistent, but the underlying pattern is mixed: some are model_action (codex_review, gemini_analyze), some are noun_noun (security_audit, edge_cases, plan_critique), and others are adjective_noun (quick_check) or a single noun (council). This is readable but not a predictable verb_noun convention throughout.
The server provides 10 tools, which fits comfortably within the ideal range of 3–15 for a focused code-review and analysis assistant. Each tool appears to earn its place by covering a specific analysis angle or model combination.
The surface covers a broad range of code quality concerns: status, quick checks, reviews, diagnosis, architecture analysis, security, edge cases, plan critique, and multi-model council. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for performance analysis or dependency auditing, but the core lifecycle for reviewing and understanding code is well represented.