Skip to main content
Glama
RSS3-Network

RSS3 MCP Server

Official
by RSS3-Network

API-getNetworkActivities

Retrieve network activity data from decentralized chains and social platforms to monitor blockchain interactions and social engagements.

Instructions

Retrieve Network Activities

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • This handler executes all dynamic tools derived from OpenAPI specs, including 'API-getNetworkActivities'. It looks up the operation by tool name in openApiLookup and calls the HttpClient to perform the API request, handling responses and errors.
    server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
    	// console.error("call tool", request.params);
    	const { name, arguments: params } = request.params;
    
    	console.error("name", name);
    
    	if (name === "API-get-input-schema") {
    		for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    			for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    				mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    			)) {
    				for (const method of def.methods) {
    					const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    					const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    					if (truncatedToolName === params.toolName) {
    						return {
    							content: [
    								{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(method.inputSchema) },
    							],
    						};
    					}
    				}
    			}
    		}
    		throw new Error(`Method ${params.toolName} not found`);
    	}
    
    	// find operation
    	const mcpToolWithClient = mcpToolWithClients.find(
    		(t) => t.mcpTools.openApiLookup[name],
    	);
    	if (!mcpToolWithClient) {
    		throw new Error(`Method ${name} not found`);
    	}
    
    	const operation = mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.openApiLookup[name];
    
    	// execute
    	try {
    		const response = await mcpToolWithClient.client.executeOperation(
    			operation,
    			params,
    		);
    		return {
    			content: [
    				{
    					type: "text", // currently this is the only type that seems to be used by mcp server
    					text: JSON.stringify(response.data), // TODO: pass through the http status code text?
    				},
    			],
    		};
    	} catch (error) {
    		console.error("Error in tool call", error);
    		if (error instanceof HttpClientError) {
    			console.error(
    				"HttpClientError encountered, returning structured error",
    				error,
    			);
    			const data = error.data?.response?.data ?? error.data ?? {};
    			return {
    				content: [
    					{
    						type: "text",
    						text: JSON.stringify({
    							status: "error", // TODO: get this from http status code?
    							...(typeof data === "object" ? data : { data: data }),
    						}),
    					},
    				],
    			};
    		}
    		throw error;
    	}
    });
  • index.js:100-147 (registration)
    This handler lists all available tools, dynamically generating entries for each OpenAPI operation as 'toolName-methodName' (truncated), including 'API-getNetworkActivities' if present in the spec, and prepends the schema getter tool.
    server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
    	console.error("list tools");
    	/**
    	 * @typedef {import("@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/types.js").Tool} Tool
    	 * @type {Tool[]}
    	 */
    	const tools = [];
    
    	for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    		for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    			mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    		)) {
    			for (const method of def.methods) {
    				console.error("method", method);
    				const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    				const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    				const trimmedDescription = method.description.split("Error")[0].trim();
    				tools.push({
    					name: truncatedToolName,
    					description: trimmedDescription,
    					inputSchema: {
    						type: "object",
    						properties: {},
    					},
    				});
    			}
    		}
    	}
    
    	tools.unshift({
    		name: "API-get-input-schema",
    		description:
    			"Get the input schema for a given API. We should always use this tool to get the input schema for a given API before calling the API.",
    		inputSchema: {
    			type: "object",
    			properties: {
    				toolName: {
    					type: "string",
    					description: "The name of the tool to get the input schema for",
    				},
    			},
    		},
    	});
    
    	console.error("tools", tools);
    
    	return { tools };
    });
  • Special case within the handler for the 'API-get-input-schema' tool, which returns the exact input schema from the OpenAPI spec for any dynamic tool, including 'API-getNetworkActivities'.
    if (name === "API-get-input-schema") {
    	for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    		for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    			mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    		)) {
    			for (const method of def.methods) {
    				const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    				const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    				if (truncatedToolName === params.toolName) {
    					return {
    						content: [
    							{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(method.inputSchema) },
    						],
    					};
    				}
    			}
    		}
    	}
    	throw new Error(`Method ${params.toolName} not found`);
    }
  • Creates the MCP tools definitions and associates them with their HttpClients by converting OpenAPI specs to MCP tools, enabling dynamic tool handling including 'API-getNetworkActivities'.
    const mcpToolWithClients = converterWithClients.map((cwc) => {
    	const mcpTools = cwc.converter.convertToMCPTools();
    	return {
    		mcpTools,
    		client: cwc.client,
    	};
    });
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Retrieve' implies a read operation, but it doesn't specify if this is safe, requires authentication, has rate limits, or what the return format looks like. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single phrase 'Retrieve Network Activities', which is front-loaded and efficient with zero waste. It could be more structured with additional context, but for its brevity, it earns a high score in conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and a vague purpose, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'network activities' are, how results are returned, or any behavioral traits. For a tool in a complex domain with many siblings, this leaves critical gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, meaning no parameters are documented in the schema. The description doesn't mention any parameters, which is appropriate since there are none. This aligns with the baseline of 4 for zero parameters, as no additional semantic information is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Retrieve Network Activities' states the verb (retrieve) and resource (network activities), which provides a basic purpose. However, it's vague about what 'network activities' specifically entails compared to siblings like 'getFederatedNetworkActivities' or 'getPlatformActivities', lacking differentiation. It doesn't specify scope or format, making it minimally adequate but unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings like 'getFederatedNetworkActivities' and 'getPlatformActivities', it fails to indicate context, exclusions, or prerequisites. This leaves the agent without direction for selection among similar tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RSS3-Network/mcp-server-rss3'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server