Skip to main content
Glama
RSS3-Network

RSS3 MCP Server

Official
by RSS3-Network

API-getEpochsAverageAPY

Calculate average APY across multiple epochs to analyze historical yield performance in decentralized finance networks.

Instructions

Retrieve the average of epochs APY

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • Generic handler for executing all dynamically generated API tools, including "API-getEpochsAverageAPY". It resolves the tool name to an OpenAPI operation and calls the HttpClient to execute it against the RSS3 API.
    server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
    	// console.error("call tool", request.params);
    	const { name, arguments: params } = request.params;
    
    	console.error("name", name);
    
    	if (name === "API-get-input-schema") {
    		for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    			for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    				mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    			)) {
    				for (const method of def.methods) {
    					const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    					const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    					if (truncatedToolName === params.toolName) {
    						return {
    							content: [
    								{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(method.inputSchema) },
    							],
    						};
    					}
    				}
    			}
    		}
    		throw new Error(`Method ${params.toolName} not found`);
    	}
    
    	// find operation
    	const mcpToolWithClient = mcpToolWithClients.find(
    		(t) => t.mcpTools.openApiLookup[name],
    	);
    	if (!mcpToolWithClient) {
    		throw new Error(`Method ${name} not found`);
    	}
    
    	const operation = mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.openApiLookup[name];
    
    	// execute
    	try {
    		const response = await mcpToolWithClient.client.executeOperation(
    			operation,
    			params,
    		);
    		return {
    			content: [
    				{
    					type: "text", // currently this is the only type that seems to be used by mcp server
    					text: JSON.stringify(response.data), // TODO: pass through the http status code text?
    				},
    			],
    		};
    	} catch (error) {
    		console.error("Error in tool call", error);
    		if (error instanceof HttpClientError) {
    			console.error(
    				"HttpClientError encountered, returning structured error",
    				error,
    			);
    			const data = error.data?.response?.data ?? error.data ?? {};
    			return {
    				content: [
    					{
    						type: "text",
    						text: JSON.stringify({
    							status: "error", // TODO: get this from http status code?
    							...(typeof data === "object" ? data : { data: data }),
    						}),
    					},
    				],
    			};
    		}
    		throw error;
    	}
    });
  • index.js:100-147 (registration)
    Dynamically generates and registers the list of available tools from RSS3 OpenAPI specifications using OpenAPIToMCPConverter. Tools are named as `{tool}-{method}`, truncated to 64 chars, which includes "API-getEpochsAverageAPY".
    server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => {
    	console.error("list tools");
    	/**
    	 * @typedef {import("@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/types.js").Tool} Tool
    	 * @type {Tool[]}
    	 */
    	const tools = [];
    
    	for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    		for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    			mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    		)) {
    			for (const method of def.methods) {
    				console.error("method", method);
    				const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    				const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    				const trimmedDescription = method.description.split("Error")[0].trim();
    				tools.push({
    					name: truncatedToolName,
    					description: trimmedDescription,
    					inputSchema: {
    						type: "object",
    						properties: {},
    					},
    				});
    			}
    		}
    	}
    
    	tools.unshift({
    		name: "API-get-input-schema",
    		description:
    			"Get the input schema for a given API. We should always use this tool to get the input schema for a given API before calling the API.",
    		inputSchema: {
    			type: "object",
    			properties: {
    				toolName: {
    					type: "string",
    					description: "The name of the tool to get the input schema for",
    				},
    			},
    		},
    	});
    
    	console.error("tools", tools);
    
    	return { tools };
    });
  • Helper tool "API-get-input-schema" that provides the input schema for any dynamic API tool like "API-getEpochsAverageAPY" by resolving from the OpenAPI specs.
    if (name === "API-get-input-schema") {
    	for (const mcpToolWithClient of mcpToolWithClients) {
    		for (const [toolName, def] of Object.entries(
    			mcpToolWithClient.mcpTools.tools,
    		)) {
    			for (const method of def.methods) {
    				const toolNameWithMethod = `${toolName}-${method.name}`;
    				const truncatedToolName = toolNameWithMethod.slice(0, 64);
    				if (truncatedToolName === params.toolName) {
    					return {
    						content: [
    							{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(method.inputSchema) },
    						],
    					};
    				}
    			}
    		}
    	}
    	throw new Error(`Method ${params.toolName} not found`);
    }
  • Converts OpenAPI specs from RSS3 APIs into MCP tools and associates HttpClients for execution. This generates the definitions used for "API-getEpochsAverageAPY".
    const converterWithClients = openApiSpecs.map((o) => {
    	const converter = new OpenAPIToMCPConverter(o.spec);
    	return {
    		converter,
    		client: o.client,
    	};
    });
    const mcpToolWithClients = converterWithClients.map((cwc) => {
    	const mcpTools = cwc.converter.convertToMCPTools();
    	return {
    		mcpTools,
    		client: cwc.client,
    	};
    });
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'retrieve', implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose behavioral traits like rate limits, authentication needs, data freshness, or error handling. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the core purpose, making it easy to scan and understand quickly. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 0 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It states what the tool does but lacks context on behavior, output format, or usage scenarios. For a simple retrieval tool, this is acceptable but leaves gaps in understanding how to interpret results.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description does not add parameter details, which is appropriate. A baseline of 4 is applied as it compensates adequately for the lack of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Retrieve the average of epochs APY' clearly states the action (retrieve) and resource (average APY across epochs). It distinguishes from siblings like 'API-getEpochAPYSnapshots' (which likely provides detailed snapshots) and 'API-getAllEpochs' (which likely lists epochs). However, it could be more specific about what 'APY' stands for or the exact calculation method.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions, such as whether this is for summary statistics versus detailed data. With siblings like 'API-getEpochAPYSnapshots', users might not know when to choose one over the other.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/RSS3-Network/mcp-server-rss3'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server