cmw_meas_fetch_spectrum

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden, but only implies a read-only fetch. It does not disclose whether a prior measurement setup is required, what happens if no results exist, or any errors or side effects. 'Fetch' weakly signals non-destructive behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with the key action and object front-loaded. There is no wasted text, though it is minimal to the point of being under-specified in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a measurement fetch tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description lacks critical context: expected return format, dependency on prior trigger/configuration, and relationship to sibling measurement tools. It is not complete enough for an agent to invoke confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning for the host and port parameters. The parameter names hint at network address/port, but the tool does not compensate for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Fetch') and identifies the resource ('GPRF spectrum measurement results'), distinguishing it from sibling fetch tools like cmw_meas_fetch_power. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives or describe the nature of the returned spectrum data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites such as configuring the measurement (cmw_meas_configure_spectrum) or triggering before fetching. The description simply states the action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.