cmw_meas_configure_power

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Configure', giving no information about side effects, required state, reversibility, or safety. For a configuration tool that may alter instrument settings, this is a critical omission.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase, making it concise and front-loaded. However, it is under-specified and does not earn its place by adding meaningful information beyond the tool name. It could be expanded with key details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely inadequate. It does not explain the effect of configuration, return values, prerequisites, or how it fits into the measurement workflow. This is insufficient for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter-specific meaning beyond the input schema. Schema coverage is 60%, with host and port lacking descriptions, and the tool description does not compensate. Other parameters like repetition and meas_length_s have schema descriptions, but the tool description itself provides no guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it configures GPRF power measurement parameters, using a specific verb ('Configure') and resource ('GPRF power measurement parameters'). It partially distinguishes from sibling tools like cmw_meas_configure_spectrum by focusing on power, but does not clarify what specific parameters are set or how it differs from cmw_meas_set_power_filter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions. Usage is only implied by the tool's name and generic description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.