Skip to main content
Glama
Python-Blade

Expense Tracker MCP Server

by Python-Blade
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Expense Tracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ExpenseTracker MCP Server

      axitmakwana45-cloud
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that lets LLM clients track, query, and summarize personal expenses using a local SQLite database.
      -

    • Expense Tracker MCP Server

      ameympatil
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for tracking personal expenses. This server provides tools to add, list, and summarize expenses, utilizing a local SQLite database for storage.
      3
      -

    • Expense Tracker MCP Server

      Soumya26Agrawal
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude track, list, and summarize personal expenses through natural conversation, backed by SQLite and deployable locally or to FastMCP Cloud.
      3
      -

    • Expense Tracker MCP Server

      talha963
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An AI-native expense tracker MCP server that enables AI assistants to add and list expenses in a local SQLite database.
      -

    • expense-tracker-mcp-server

      SAYOUNCDR
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracking personal expenses using FastMCP and SQLite, enabling adding, listing, updating, deleting expenses and summarizing by category via natural language tools.
      5
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    add_expense, delete_expense, and list_expenses target clearly distinct operations on the same resource. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: add_expense, delete_expense, list_expenses. The plural in list_expenses is natural for a list operation.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is reasonable for a minimal expense tracker, and each tool has a clear purpose. However, the surface is on the thin side for typical expense-tracking workflows.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers add, delete, and list, but lacks update_expense and get_expense, which are notable gaps for correcting or inspecting individual records. Reporting operations like totals or filtering by category/date are also absent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources