place_multileg_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The warning 'This executes a real trade' adds behavioral context beyond annotations, which indicate readOnlyHint=false. No further details on auth or rate limits, but the pre-flight suggestion mitigates risk.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a warning first, then parameter details and an example. It is slightly lengthy but every sentence adds value; could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity and presence of output schema, the description covers parameters and behavior adequately. It does not mention failure handling or edge cases, but overall is complete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by detailing each parameter, including the legs structure with an example, and clarifying optional fields and defaults like time_in_force and account_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Place a multi-leg order (options strategies: spreads, straddles, etc.)', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like place_call_credit_spread by generalizing to any multi-leg strategy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises to 'Consider running preflight_multileg_order first', providing clear when-to-use guidance. However, it does not explicitly compare to siblings or state when not to use this tool, missing exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.