place_call_credit_spread

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Warns that the tool executes a real trade, which is critical behavioral context beyond annotations (which only indicate not read-only or destructive). Additional details like net credit are helpful; could elaborate on trade irreversibility but sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise and well-structured: title, strategy explanation, warning, then parameter list. No wasted words; each sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the essential aspects: what it does, how to use it, and when to use preflight. Could mention that this is a bearish strategy, but the title implies it. Output schema exists, so return values are covered. Complete for the task.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining each parameter's meaning, constraints (e.g., 'lower strike' for sell, 'minimum net credit' for limit_price), and optionality, adding significant value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Explicitly states it places a Bear Call Spread, describes the mechanics (sell lower strike, buy higher strike, net credit), and is distinct from sibling tools like call debit spreads or put spreads.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly warns that this executes a real trade and recommends running preflight_call_credit_spread first, providing explicit when-to-use and alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.