custsupport
Related Servers
Alternatives to custsupport
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes a synthetic issue tracker and pipeline warehouse as callable tools so an agent can answer operational questions about tickets, pipeline health, runs, incidents, and governed metrics with every claim cited to the exact tool call it came from. All writes are proposal-only, requiring human approval through a gated apply path that logs each step for audit.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to manage customers and support tickets through database-backed CRUD tools, contextual customer and knowledge resources, and a reusable ticket-triage prompt.13-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes read-only knowledge base articles on returns, warranty and shipping policies alongside tools that search, retrieve and create real support tickets. This lets an LLM agent ground its answers in store policy without inventing information, and act on actual ticket data rather than simulated records.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables asking questions in plain English about 61,765 customer-support tickets, returning exact answers computed via SQL queries over DuckDB.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural-language Q&A over customer support ticket data. Provides tools for schema inspection, SQL-based ticket counts and grouping, and full-text search for customer wording without requiring API keys.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Zendesk support workflows through tools for semantic ticket search, customer context retrieval, solution version assessment, and daily work summaries.428 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Tools are largely distinct, but aggregation tools like daily_digest, category_breakdown, and sla_risk_summary overlap in the data they summarize, which could lead to misselection. Descriptions clarify their differences, but the boundary between daily_digest and category_breakdown is subtle.
Names follow snake_case and are generally clear, but mix verb-first (list_open_tickets, get_ticket) with noun-first patterns (sla_breaches, category_breakdown). Despite the mix, the naming is predictable and readable, with no camelCase or chaotic variations.
9 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a focused domain. Each tool covers a distinct part of the support workflow—listing, detail, aggregation, SLA monitoring, draft replies, escalation, and status updates—without redundancy or bloat.
The surface covers the main support lifecycle: read (list, get), aggregate (breakdowns, SLA risk), assist (draft reply, escalation), and write (update status). Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to create or assign tickets, but these may be handled externally. The core workflow is well supported with no dead ends.