universal-mcp-fs
Related Servers
Alternatives to universal-mcp-fs
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA secure MCP server that exposes local filesystem operations to AI clients with sandboxed access and runtime directory changes.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA security-first MCP server that gives AI assistants controlled, safe access to manage remote servers via SSH with whitelisted operations and no generic command execution.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets an AI assistant run commands and transfer files over SSH without exposing connection details.5MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the local machine through terminal, filesystem, and Python execution tools.91-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn enhanced MCP server that grants AI assistants the ability to execute terminal commands on a user's system with improved security controls, designed for use in controlled environments.2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants safely access local git repositories, with free reads and gated writes requiring explicit confirmation.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: read_file vs read_file_lines differ by scope; write_file, move_file, copy_file, delete_file, delete_directory are all unique operations; search_files vs search_content are different search types; run_command vs run_command_background vs process management tools are separate; system_info and file_info are metadata distinct from content tools. No overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., read_file, list_directory, search_content, kill_process). No mixing of camelCase or other conventions, making the namespace predictable.
17 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool covers a distinct operation (file read/write, directory ops, searching, command execution, process management, system info) and the scope justifies the count. It feels well-scoped for a file system server.
The tool set covers all essential file system operations: create, read, update (overwrite), delete for files; directory creation and deletion; move/copy; file and content search; metadata retrieval; and even command execution with process management. No obvious gaps for common tasks.