Skip to main content
Glama
PostOakLabs

ainumbers-mcp-apps

by PostOakLabs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ainumbers-mcp-apps

  • Square MCP Server

    block
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    A server that enables interaction with Square's API via Goose, supporting queries for locations, customers, and more with context preservation and MCP-compliant responses.
    12
    4
    MIT
  • Xero MCP Server by XeroAPI

    Xero MCP Serverofficial

    XeroAPI
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server implementation providing standardized access to Xero's accounting and business features, enabling operations like contact management, invoice creation, and chart of accounts management through MCP.
    51
    4,533
    364
    MIT
  • Dodo Payments by dodopayments

    Dodo Paymentsofficial

    dodopayments
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    The Dodo Payments MCP Server integrates with agentic frameworks to provide a lightweight, serverless-compatible interface for AI-driven payment operations like billing, subscriptions, and customer management. It enables autonomous agents to securely act on behalf of users using the Dodo Payments
    1,102
    54
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • pulsenetwork-mcp

    GTCC777
    A
    license
    C
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    One MCP install that lets your AI agents discover and pay (x402 micropayments, USDC on Base + Solana) for 66 specialized real-time intelligence APIs - finance, crypto, insurance, immigration, legal, markets and more. 68 tools, pey-per-query, no subscription.
    69
    30
    3
    Apache 2.0

  • FeedOracle Compliance MCP

    feedoracle
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    53 regulatory compliance evidence tools across 3 MCP servers for AI agents. MiCA authorization status, DORA evidence packs, stablecoin risk scoring (105+ tokens), macro intelligence (86 FRED series). Every response ECDSA-signed (ES256K), blockchain-anchored, audit-ready. Free tier, OAuth 2.0.
    MIT

  • aipaygen-mcp

    Damien829
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    250+ AI-powered MCP tools: research, write, code, translate, scrape, sentiment, vision, RAG, agent memory, marketplace, trading signals, and more. 15 models across 7 providers. Pay-per-use via API key or x402 USDC micropayments.
    2
    MIT

  • LiveDataLink

    blackboxfoundry
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    62 real-time data tools for AI agents via MCP. Finance, crypto, FMCSA, sanctions, courts, weather, vehicles, cybersecurity. One bearer token, one bill. Free tier available.
    MIT

  • StatePulse API

    Ahmed-Achtatar
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    55+ pay-per-call tools for AI agents over MCP: live telemetry, blockchain/on-chain checks, environmental, transit, finance, and network utilities. No API key or signup — agents pay per request with x402 USDC micropayments (Base and Solana).
    MIT

  • @praveen030686/data-apis-mcp

    yantrix-ai
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    22 MCP tools for AI agents: crypto prices and trading signals (53 coins), stock prices and company financials, forex rates and conversion, and web scraping with AI summaries. All powered by x402 USDC micropayments on Base. $0.01-$0.25 per request.
    22
    19
    MIT
Deploy Server
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 16 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, such as MCP validation vs. payment protocol analysis. However, there is slight overlap among AP2-related tools (ap2_aml_mandate_builder, build_google_ap2_mandate, validate_ap2_mcp_policy) and MCP validation tools (lint_mcp_tool_definition, validate_mcp_server_json, score_mcp_readiness, audit_mcp_oauth) that could cause confusion if descriptions are not carefully read.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming convention is mixed: some tools start with a verb (e.g., 'validate_mcp_server_json', 'scan_tool_poisoning') while others start with a noun (e.g., 'agentic_mandate_sandbox', 'customer_risk_rating'). All use snake_case, which is readable, but the lack of a consistent verb_noun pattern reduces clarity.

Tool Count4/5

With 16 tools, the server covers a broad range of fintech and MCP utilities without being excessive. The count is slightly high for a single domain, but each tool serves a specific purpose and the variety is justified by the toolkit nature of the server.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers key areas like agentic payments, AML/KYC, MCP validation, and BaaS comparison. However, there are notable gaps: for MCP, only validation tools exist without creation/management tools; for payments, comparison and decoding are present but no payment creation tools. The surface is partially complete for a general fintech toolkit.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources