mssql_get_stored_procedures

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as read-only and idempotent. The description adds that it returns definitions and parameters, which provides extra context. No behavioral traits beyond annotations are disclosed, but no contradictions either.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first conveys the main purpose, the second adds a key option. Every sentence is necessary, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, so the description should ideally hint at the return structure. It mentions 'definitions and parameters' but lacks specifics. For a simple listing tool with safe annotations, this is somewhat adequate but could benefit from more detail about what the output contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are fully described. The description adds a brief explanation for the optional filter and clarifies the response_format enum values, but does not add significant meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists stored procedures with definitions and parameters, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like mssql_get_views or mssql_get_schema by focusing on stored procedures.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions optional filtering by procedure name, giving a hint about usage. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., mssql_get_schema or mssql_query), nor does it provide any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.