Skip to main content
Glama
PixdataOrg

coderide

by PixdataOrg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to coderide

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • io.github.saicharanrajoju/lets

      saicharanrajoju
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables two developers using Claude Code to collaborate in real time on the same codebase, with file locking, guest write approvals, and secure session joining. It connects host and guest Claude Code sessions to a shared project with tools for file operations, locks, and notifications.
      MIT

    • Claude Code Bridge

      Cyruskraad
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets Codex delegate coding and repository work to an installed Claude Code CLI with permission-aware inspect/write access, model and effort selection, resumable and cloud-attached sessions, and durable synchronous or asynchronous jobs.
      MIT

    • tsgram-mcp

      areweai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude Code sessions to Telegram, enabling AI-powered code assistance and file management directly from Telegram chats.
      89
      MIT

    • ClawBridge

      lxivlog64
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to dispatch well-scoped development tasks to a remote CodeBuddy Code instance, specify model and reasoning effort, monitor progress, retrieve results, and review Git changes without auto-merging.
      5 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: getting, listing, updating, or starting projects/tasks. No two tools overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (get_project, list_tasks, update_task), but 'next_task' deviates by using a noun phrase instead of a verb. This minor inconsistency is still clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a project/task management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without being excessive or too sparse.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain appears to be project and task management, but there is no way to create or delete projects or tasks. Only update and list/get operations are provided, which is a significant gap for a complete workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources