coderide
Related Servers
Alternatives to coderide
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables OpenAI Codex users to drive coding tasks remotely from their phone chat: sending messages, images, files and voice to Codex, and receiving task-completion notifications with Markdown-formatted results and media. Includes 24-hour window queueing, typing indicators, login/status tools, and watchdog-backed reliability so nothing is silently dropped.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceShare coding-agent sessions with your team: /share in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI, Cursor or ZCode, and a teammate /pickup's it in theirs with the goal, decisions, next steps and recent conversation. Tools to share, search, load, comment on and update sessions, plus team activity.156AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOne shared project for your team's Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents: a task board, decisions and handoffs. Everyone keeps their own plan.1359-
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceRoutes coding tasks across multiple AI CLIs (Copilot, Claude Code, Gemini, etc.) with cost-aware tier routing and parallel wave orchestration.552Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceConnects multiple AI coding agents on a team through a shared hub, giving each agent live teammate status, a versioned master prompt, a shared task board, questions and answers, and file claims so agents don't overwrite each other's work. Works across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor while code itself continues to flow through git.10102 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Codex to orchestrate multi-agent coding by routing tasks to local Claude Code workers via CCSwitch, managing cost and model selection for planning, execution, and review.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: getting, listing, updating, or starting projects/tasks. No two tools overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right one.
Tools mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (get_project, list_tasks, update_task), but 'next_task' deviates by using a noun phrase instead of a verb. This minor inconsistency is still clear.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a project/task management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without being excessive or too sparse.
The domain appears to be project and task management, but there is no way to create or delete projects or tasks. Only update and list/get operations are provided, which is a significant gap for a complete workflow.