tiendanube_create_business_rule

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states what the tool does, with no mention of side effects, permissions, idempotency, rate limits, or return value. This insufficient transparency fails to inform the agent about safe or expected usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundancy. It is front-loaded with the core action and scope. While more structure could be beneficial for a tool with six parameters, the current conciseness is adequate and not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (6 parameters, nested conditions and actions, no output schema, no annotations), the description is too minimal. It does not explain what happens after creation (e.g., rule activation, applied context), potential impacts on store operations, or how to interpret the result. The agent lacks sufficient context for informed invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions, which are already clear. It neither enhances nor detracts from the schema's guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('business rule'), and specifies the scope ('for filtering products, customers, or orders'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like update, delete, or list. The verb-resource combination is precise and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as tiendanube_update_business_rule or tiendanube_delete_business_rule. The description lacks context about prerequisites or when creation is appropriate, leaving the agent to infer from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.