bybit_futures_grid_close

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only mentions 'via official Bybit bot endpoint', which is not a behavioral trait. It does not disclose side effects, reversibility, authentication needs, or idempotency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, straightforward sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the core action. However, it could be expanded slightly to cover parameter semantics without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema, annotations, and parameter descriptions, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, error conditions, or contextual requirements like having an active grid bot.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description must compensate but fails to explain parameters. 'bot_id' is implied by the action, but 'close_type' is not described at all. No values, formats, or defaults are indicated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it closes a futures grid bot via the official Bybit endpoint. The verb 'close' and resource 'Futures Grid Bot' are specific, distinguishing it from other sibling tools. However, it lacks a title and does not elaborate on scope or variations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., existing grid bot) or scenarios where other tools might be more appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.