bybit_futures_grid_analysis

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Analyze... metrics,' which implies a read operation, but does not confirm side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or output characteristics. The minimal description leaves the agent guessing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (one sentence) and front-loaded with the action and parameter, but it is under-specified. It is concise in length but lacks structure and completeness, making it minimally acceptable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description should still provide context about what metrics are returned, how to use the bot_id, or the read-only nature. It fails to do so, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It merely restates the parameter name ('by bot_id') without adding meaning about format, source, constraints, or examples. The agent gains no additional insight beyond the parameter name in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Analyze') and the resource ('Futures Grid Bot metrics'), and specifies the key parameter ('by bot_id'). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like bybit_futures_grid_detail, but the verb 'analyze' implies a different purpose than 'detail' or 'validate'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or typical use cases. The agent receives no help in deciding between this tool and related siblings such as bybit_futures_grid_detail.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.