extract_screenshots

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that it uses AI for timestamp selection, returns base64 images, and optionally saves to disk. With no annotations provided, this description carries the burden well. However, more details about performance or API calls could enhance transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each providing distinct value: purpose, method, and output. Could be more concise by removing 'Optionally saves to disk' since it's covered in output_dir parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main aspects: video input, AI selection, number of screenshots, output format, and save behavior. However, no output schema means description could mention return format (array of base64 strings). Overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds context for 'focus' parameter but doesn't elaborate on 'resolution' enum meaning beyond schema. The 'output_dir' description adds context about fallback behavior, which adds value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it extracts screenshots from YouTube videos at important moments using AI. Distinguishes from siblings like 'extract_frames' by mentioning AI to find visually significant timestamps, but could be more specific about difference from 'extract_frames'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use for extracting key screenshots, but no explicit guidance on when to use vs siblings like 'extract_frames' or 'get_video_timestamps'. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., need ffmpeg).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.