Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to yt-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of YouTube videos using the Gemini API to generate summaries and answer specific questions via direct URLs. It supports standard videos and shorts, allowing users to interact with video content without requiring manual downloads.
      5
      11
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered YouTube video analysis including transcript management, video summaries, chapter generation, keyword extraction, and playback control. Supports searching videos, retrieving channel/playlist information, and translating transcripts using Google Gemini AI.
      14
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to analyze YouTube videos by extracting summaries, timestamped outlines, diagrams with Mermaid code, and targeted insights about specific moments using Gemini's native video understanding.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables turning public YouTube videos into full text and a short summary by having Gemini watch the video through its documented YouTube-URL input, with no downloading or caption scraping. Digests are cached in SQLite by video id, so repeated requests are free, and stored videos can be listed or searched with full-text queries.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: ask_about_video and summarize_video both deal with content analysis but differ in question vs. summary. extract_frames and extract_screenshots have clear differences (given timestamps vs. AI-chosen moments). get_video_timestamps is a preview for extraction, reducing overlap. Minor confusion possible between ask_about_video and summarize_video.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use verb_* pattern with snake_case (ask_about_video, extract_frames, etc.), which is consistent. Some verbs are compound (ask_about), but the pattern is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    5 tools is appropriate for a YouTube MCP: they cover core operations (summarize, Q&A, frame extraction, screenshot extraction, timestamp preview). Not too few or too many.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers main user needs: summarization, Q&A, and visual extraction with a preview step. Missing operations like searching videos or managing playlists, but those may be out of scope. The workflow from preview to extraction is well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSlow