Create Smart Bin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a non-read-only, non-destructive, non-idempotent, closed-world operation. The description adds the useful scope detail that the bin is created in the project panel, but does not describe duplicate-name behavior, permissions, or side effects beyond the annotation profile.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no waste, front-loading the action and resource. It is appropriately sized for a simple two-parameter creation tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose and location, and the output schema handles return values, while annotations cover safety. However, it omits practical context such as when a smart bin is preferable to a regular bin and how name collisions or query behavior are handled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters ('name' and 'query') are already documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter meaning or formatting guidance, making the schema the sole source of parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('Create a smart bin'), clarifies the synonym ('search bin'), and states the location ('project panel'). It clearly distinguishes this from the sibling 'create_bin' by specifying a smart/search bin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, no conditions for choosing this over 'create_bin' or search tools, and no prerequisites. Usage is only implied by the tool name and short description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.