resellers_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'notify: Send welcome email' and 'confirm: Required,' but it does not disclose side effects, reversibility, permission requirements, or failure behavior for this mutating operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the core purpose, and uses a clear Args block that maps directly to the schema parameters. Every line earns its place without redundant prose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The parameter list is fully covered and an output schema exists, so return values are handled. But with no annotations and no usage context, the description lacks guidance on prerequisites, side effects, and the meaning of the 'confirm' flag, leaving the agent with only partial information for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description is the only source of parameter meaning. It adds useful semantics for all eight parameters, including clarifying 'ip' values, 'notify' behavior, and 'confirm' as required. However, some entries are thin ('package: Reseller package name') and 'confirm: Required' conflicts with the schema's default false and non-required status, creating ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a clear verb and resource: 'Create a reseller from a reseller package.' It clearly identifies the action and object, and the reseller focus distinguishes it from user/admin creation tools. However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from closely related siblings like users_create or admins_create.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives, and there are no exclusions or prerequisite conditions beyond the phrase 'from a reseller package.' The description implies the core use case but leaves the agent to infer when this is the right choice among the many creation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.