login_urls_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It signals deletion but does not disclose permanence, confirm mechanics, permission requirements, idempotency, or side effects. It does not contradict annotations, so it avoids a 1.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with the action, and structured into an args list with no filler. However, the confirm line is misleading, which prevents a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive two-parameter tool with no annotations, the description is incomplete: it does not explain when confirm must be true, where url_id comes from, or what happens on deletion. Even though an output schema exists, the behavioral context needed to call it safely is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning. It only restates url_id as 'URL id' and says confirm is 'Required,' which contradicts the schema where confirm is optional with a default of false. No type, role, or allowed values for confirm are given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

'Delete a login URL.' states a clear verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from the login_urls_create/list/one_shot siblings through the delete action, but provides no scope or object-selection detail.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus login_urls_create or login_urls_list, no mention of how to obtain url_id, and no prerequisites or exclusions. The agent must infer usage entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.