Get notification
op_get_notificationRetrieve a single notification by its ID to view its details and content.
Instructions
Fetch a single notification by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| raw | No |
op_get_notificationRetrieve a single notification by its ID to view its details and content.
Fetch a single notification by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| raw | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. 'Fetch' implies read-only, but no disclosure on authentication, permissions, rate limits, or side effects. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple fetch tool, it covers the basics but lacks details on return format, defaults, or error states. With no output schema, more completeness would be beneficial.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain parameter meanings, especially the optional 'raw' boolean. Adds no value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Fetch a single notification by id' clearly states the verb (fetch), resource (notification), and identifier (by id). It distinguishes from siblings like op_list_notifications (list multiple) and op_mark_notification_read (mark read).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied: use when you have a specific notification id. However, no explicit guidance on when not to use, prerequisites, or alternatives is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OliverRhyme/openproject-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server