Delete work package

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses permanent deletion and destructiveness, which is minimal but adequate for a simple delete. However, no annotations exist, so it should mention side effects like cascading deletes or permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences, each carrying essential information about permanence and destructiveness. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description covers the basic function. However, it could mention that this action is irreversible and may affect related data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameter 'id' is not described in the description, and schema coverage is 0%. The description should at least specify that 'id' is the work package identifier. The low coverage is not compensated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Permanently delete' and the resource 'work package', and the term 'Destructive' adds emphasis. It distinguishes itself from sibling delete tools by specifying the resource type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description lacks when to use, when not to use, or alternatives. Only a vague 'Destructive' note, which implies caution but doesn't give explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.