Tender MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tender MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve public procurement notices from 17 sources across Germany, the EU, and the UK, with filtering by country, CPV code, deadline, and contract value, plus full tender details and source freshness checks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve US government contracts, look up NAICS codes, list indexed states, and score contract fit for a business profile. Provides access to live state and local procurement data through natural language without raw HTTP.7182 npmMIT

oro-intel-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceUK public procurement data for AI agents. Tenders, contracts, buyer and supplier profiles over MCP and REST. 250 free credits.MIT- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMatch your tech product or consulting service to thousands of live government tenders, RFPs, grants, and frameworks from 25+ official sources worldwide.435 npm6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search federal contracts, analyze agency spending, track competitor wins, and monitor small business set-aside opportunities using SAM.gov, USASpending.gov, and FPDS data.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_tenders finds active tenders and provides an initial verdict, while get_tender_intelligence provides deeper competitive context on a specific tender. Their descriptions and usage guidance make disambiguation straightforward.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores (search_tenders, get_tender_intelligence), using clear verbs and nouns that reflect their functionality.
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but focused on core procurement discovery tasks. While slightly below the typical 3-15 range, the narrow scope justifies the small count.
The server covers search and intelligence gathering, which are critical early steps, but lacks tools for acting on tenders (e.g., bidding, tracking). This leaves the workflow incomplete for end-to-end procurement support.