alcove_mount_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only says 'list' but does not disclose whether this is a read-only operation, whether it accesses live data or a cache, or what the scope (e.g., all workspaces) is. This is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (four words), but this brevity comes at the cost of completeness. It does not earn its place as it provides minimal value beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (list with optional filters) and the presence of an output schema, the description could be slightly more complete, but current version is insufficient. It lacks any guidance on filtering, scope, or behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no parameter descriptions. The description adds no parameter meaning whatsoever, failing to explain what 'home', 'status', or 'workspace' do or how they filter results.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List configured Alcove mounts' clearly states the verb (List) and resource (Alcove mounts), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like alcove_mount_add or alcove_mount_scan, which slightly reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool instead of alternatives (e.g., alcove_mount_scan for scanning new mounts), nor does it specify any prerequisites or contexts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.