Get Webhook
get_webhookRetrieve a webhook's details by its UUID. Access specific webhook configurations with this tool.
Instructions
Get a webhook by UUID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Webhook UUID |
get_webhookRetrieve a webhook's details by its UUID. Access specific webhook configurations with this tool.
Get a webhook by UUID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Webhook UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description lacks behavioral details such as read-only status, error handling, or permission requirements. For a simple read operation, more context is expected.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence with no waste, though it could be slightly expanded to include return value or error cases without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema is present, and the description does not explain what the response contains (e.g., webhook details). This is a significant gap for a minimal tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage with a simple uuid parameter description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description "Get a webhook by UUID" clearly states the verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like list_webhooks and update_webhook.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when a UUID is known but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_webhooks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NomaCMS/nomacms-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server