Delete Webhook
delete_webhookRemove a webhook using its UUID to stop automated notifications or integrations.
Instructions
Delete a webhook by UUID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Webhook UUID |
delete_webhookRemove a webhook using its UUID to stop automated notifications or integrations.
Delete a webhook by UUID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes | Webhook UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description only states 'delete'. It does not disclose if deletion is irreversible, side effects, or authorization requirements, leaving behavioral gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence. However, it omits important context that could be added without much length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter delete operation, the description is minimally adequate but lacks detail on return values, reversibility, or impact.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and parameter description ('Webhook UUID') is minimal. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete), resource (webhook), and identifier (by UUID). It distinguishes well from siblings like create_webhook and list_webhooks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NomaCMS/nomacms-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server