MCP Translation Text
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP Translation Texttranslate 'Hello, how are you?' from English to Spanish"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
MCP 翻译服务
基于小牛翻译(NiuTrans)API 的 MCP Provider,提供文字翻译工具和语种目录资源,方便在 Cursor/mcp-cli 等客户端中引用。
快速开始
使用 uv 安装并启动发布版
uv tool install mcp-translation-textRelated MCP server: DeepL MCP Server
环境变量
NIUTRANS_API_KEY(必填):小牛翻译开放平台提供的 API Key,可免费使用, 请登录后获取:https://niutrans.com/cloud/account_info/info
计费说明
本服务使用小牛翻译的文本翻译 API,计费规则如下:
项目 | 说明 |
计费单位 | 2000 字符 = 1 积分 |
免费额度 | 每天免费赠送 100 积分 |
每日可翻译 | 约 20 万字符(免费额度) |
💡 提示:每日免费赠送的 100 积分足够日常使用,超出部分可在小牛翻译开放平台充值购买。
MCP 客户端配置示例
若通过 uv tool install 安装,可在 mcp.json 中写:
{
"mcpServers": {
"translation": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"tool",
"run",
"mcp-translation-text"
],
"env": {
"NIUTRANS_API_KEY": "${env.NIUTRANS_API_KEY}"
}
}
}
}启动 Cursor 后执行 ListTools 即可看到 translate_text,同时支持 ListResources 读取 language://catalog。
可用功能
工具:translate_text
参数:
text:待翻译内容。source:源语言代码或别名(会通过本地映射表规范化)。target:目标语言代码或别名。
返回:
{ "source": "zh", "target": "en", "original_text": "你好", "translated_text": "Hello", "raw": { ... 小牛原始响应 ... } }
资源:language://catalog
提供所有可用语种及别名,示例如下:
{
"total": 455,
"languages": [
{"code": "zh", "zh": "中文(简体)", "en": "Chinese (Simplified)"},
{"code": "en", "zh": "英语", "en": "English"}
// ... 其余省略 ...
],
"aliases": {
"zhongwenjianti": "zh",
"english": "en"
// ... 其余省略 ...
}
}推荐在客户端的 LLM 中先读取该资源,完成语种描述到代码的映射后,再调用 translate_text。
调试与常见问题
缺少 API Key:启动时报
缺少环境变量 NIUTRANS_API_KEY,请确认已在.env或系统环境中设置。语种不支持:
translate_text会校验语种代码/别名,若报错请检查是否使用了language://catalog中列出的值。路径或依赖问题:脚本依赖
uv,请先安装pip install uv或参考 uv 文档。命令名称:通过 PyPI 安装后,可直接运行
mcp-translation-text;若 global PATH 中找不到,记得激活虚拟环境或使用python -m mcp_translation_text。发布/升级包:
python -m build twine upload dist/*
目录结构(关键文件)
E:\MCP
├── pyproject.toml
├── server.py # 入口包装,确保 python server.py 可运行
├── src/
│ └── translation_server.py
├── scripts/
│ ├── start.ps1
│ └── start.sh
├── .env.example
├── LICENSE
└── README.md发布后,用户只需设置 NiuTrans API Key,即可通过 mcp-translation-text 直接加载该 Provider。
Available Tools
1 tooltranslate_textA
使用小牛翻译 API 将文本从 source 语种翻译到 target 语种。
支持 450+ 种语言代码,并可自动处理常见别名。返回结构包含译文和 API 原始响应。
Args:
text (str): 待翻译的原文文本,可以是任意长度的字符串。
source (str): 源语言代码或常见别名(例如 "zh"、"中文"、"chinese")。
target (str): 目标语言代码或常见别名(例如 "en"、"英文"、"english")。
Returns:
Dict[str, Any]: 包含以下字段的字典:
- source: 标准化后的源语言代码
- target: 标准化后的目标语言代码
- original_text: 原文
- translated_text: 译文
- raw: 小牛翻译 API 的原始响应数据
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | 待翻译的原文文本,可以是任意长度的字符串。 | |
| source | Yes | 源语言代码或常见别名(例如 "zh"、"中文"、"chinese")。 | |
| target | Yes | 目标语言代码或常见别名(例如 "en"、"英文"、"english")。 |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden and adds valuable behavioral context: it specifies the API provider (小牛翻译), mentions support for 450+ languages with alias handling, and details the return structure including raw API response. However, it doesn't cover potential limitations like rate limits or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded: it starts with the core purpose, followed by key features, then detailed parameter and return explanations. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy, making it efficient and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's moderate complexity, 100% schema coverage, and the presence of an output schema (detailed in the Returns section), the description is complete. It covers purpose, parameters, return values, and behavioral aspects like language support, leaving no significant gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful context by explaining that parameters accept '语言代码或常见别名' and providing concrete examples (e.g., 'zh', '中文', 'chinese'), which clarifies usage beyond the schema's basic descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('使用小牛翻译 API 将文本从 source 语种翻译到 target 语种') with the resource (text) and scope (450+ languages with alias handling). It distinguishes itself by mentioning the API provider and comprehensive language support, though no siblings exist for comparison.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for text translation with language codes or aliases, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other translation services or methods). Since no sibling tools exist, this is adequate but lacks broader context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single translate_text tool has a clearly defined purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in this server.
With only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool follows a clear verb_noun pattern (translate_text) that would serve as a good model if more tools were added.
A single tool for a translation server feels thin and incomplete. While translation is a focused task, even basic translation workflows might benefit from additional tools like language detection, batch translation, or translation history management. One tool is insufficient for proper coverage of the domain.
The server provides only a single translation endpoint with no supporting operations. There are significant gaps: no language detection tool, no batch translation capability, no way to list supported languages, and no management of translation history or preferences. The surface is severely incomplete for a translation service.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Translate MCP — wraps LibreTranslate API (https://libretranslate.com/)
MCP server for Translation Services
LibreTranslate MCP — open-source machine translation (BYO endpoint)
Phrase MCP server: language intelligence platform for translation, terminology, and quality.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing machine translation capabilities via the Lara Translate API, featuring language detection and context-aware translations between numerous language pairs.221,06096MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables translation and text rephrasing using DeepL's API through a cloud-deployed MCP server. Provides translation between multiple languages, text rephrasing, and language detection capabilities with professional deployment features.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides text translation capabilities using the Niutrans API, supporting 455+ languages with code/alias mapping through a language catalog resource.15MIT

nativ-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAI-powered localization platform. Translate text, search translation memory, and access style guides from any MCP-compatible AI tool.81MIT
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NiuTrans/MCP-TextTranslation'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server