delete_user
Remove a user and all associated stored information from the fraud detection system.
Instructions
Delete a user and remove their stored information
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | User ID to delete |
Remove a user and all associated stored information from the fraud detection system.
Delete a user and remove their stored information
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | User ID to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the destructive action but omits consequences (e.g., irreversibility, cascading effects on related data) and access requirements. Minimal disclosure for a destructive operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundancy. Efficiently conveys the core purpose, but could include more context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the basic purpose but lacks guidance on return behavior or error cases. Adequate but not enriched.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter (userId) described as 'User ID to delete'. The tool description adds no further detail about the parameter beyond what the schema provides, so it meets baseline without enhancement.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('delete') and resource ('user'), adding specificity with 'remove their stored information'. This effectively distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_user, get_user, update_user, and list_users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, though the destructive nature is implied. The description does not address prerequisites or situations where deletion is inappropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Nitrostack-HAK/Fraud-Alert-MCP-HAK'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server