FinRAG-MCP
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMBED_MODEL | No | The embedding model to use | text-embedding-3-large |
| FINRAG_ROLE | No | The role for RBAC access control | EMPLOYEE |
| OPENAI_MODEL | No | The OpenAI model to use | gpt-4o-mini |
| OPENAI_API_KEY | Yes | Your OpenAI API key | |
| QDRANT_LOCAL_PATH | No | The local path for Qdrant vector database | .qdrant_local |
| QDRANT_COLLECTION_PREFIX | No | The prefix for Qdrant collections | finrag |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| set_roleB | Set the active role for this MCP session. Returns the domains the role can access. |
| list_filesA | |
| read_fileC | Read a text-like file relative to repo root, RBAC-enforced by folder domain. |
| searchA | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: list_files for listing, read_file for reading content, search for vector search, and set_role for role management. No overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, read_file, search, set_role), making predictable and easy to understand.
With 4 tools covering file listing, reading, search, and role setting, the count is appropriate for a focused RAG server. Slightly more tools (e.g., for data management) could be justified, but current scope is reasonable.
Covers core retrieval operations (list, read, search) and role management, but lacks data ingestion, deletion, or role listing/management beyond setting. Notable gap for a full RAG workflow.