Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to FinRAG-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying corporate knowledge such as HR policies, vendor contracts, and support FAQs, with every answer grounded in an exact source and retrieval quality and hallucination rate explicitly measured.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local AI assistant that answers questions across a company's internal knowledge using MCP, providing controlled access to internal documents with role-based permissions and citations.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An enterprise-grade MCP gateway and security router that gives AI agents secure, observable access to internal corporate knowledge through hybrid vector+BM25 retrieval, RBAC, and prompt injection protection.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access cited company documents and perform permission-gated operational actions (HR, IT access, vendor extraction, renewal) with explicit scope, evidence checks, and durable human approval gates.
      -
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language querying of simulated HR data through a safety-gated MCP tool layer, routing questions to SQL or policy document retrieval with PII masking, role-based access, and an offline evaluation harness.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: list_files for listing, read_file for reading content, search for vector search, and set_role for role management. No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, read_file, search, set_role), making predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools covering file listing, reading, search, and role setting, the count is appropriate for a focused RAG server. Slightly more tools (e.g., for data management) could be justified, but current scope is reasonable.

    Completeness3/5

    Covers core retrieval operations (list, read, search) and role management, but lacks data ingestion, deletion, or role listing/management beyond setting. Notable gap for a full RAG workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues