FinRAG-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to FinRAG-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying corporate knowledge such as HR policies, vendor contracts, and support FAQs, with every answer grounded in an exact source and retrieval quality and hallucination rate explicitly measured.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local AI assistant that answers questions across a company's internal knowledge using MCP, providing controlled access to internal documents with role-based permissions and citations.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn enterprise-grade MCP gateway and security router that gives AI agents secure, observable access to internal corporate knowledge through hybrid vector+BM25 retrieval, RBAC, and prompt injection protection.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely search and ingest corporate documents via MCP, offering hybrid retrieval, PII sanitization, role-based access control, and citation validation.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to access cited company documents and perform permission-gated operational actions (HR, IT access, vendor extraction, renewal) with explicit scope, evidence checks, and durable human approval gates.-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables natural-language querying of simulated HR data through a safety-gated MCP tool layer, routing questions to SQL or policy document retrieval with PII masking, role-based access, and an offline evaluation harness.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: list_files for listing, read_file for reading content, search for vector search, and set_role for role management. No overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, read_file, search, set_role), making predictable and easy to understand.
With 4 tools covering file listing, reading, search, and role setting, the count is appropriate for a focused RAG server. Slightly more tools (e.g., for data management) could be justified, but current scope is reasonable.
Covers core retrieval operations (list, read, search) and role management, but lacks data ingestion, deletion, or role listing/management beyond setting. Notable gap for a full RAG workflow.