Skip to main content
Glama
NimbleBrainInc

synapse-research

get_research_run

Fetch a specific research run by its ID to access its results and progress.

Instructions

Get a research_run by ID. IDs start with rr_.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
research_run_idYesresearch_run ID (rr_...)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesThe research query or topic
titleNoShort human label for the run (3–8 words). Distinct from `query`, which holds the full research brief. Auto-generated server-side via the FAST_LLM shortly after the entity is created when not supplied by the caller. Renders in list rows and as the detail-view heading; the UI falls back to a truncated `query` while title is null.
reportNoThe final markdown report. Populated when status becomes 'completed'.
sourcesNoSources consulted during the research run. Populated incrementally during the 'Gathering sources' phase.
progressNoCompletion percent (0–100)
run_statusNoExecution status, mirrors the MCP task status for the underlying run. Distinct from the base entity `status` field which tracks lifecycle (active/archived/deleted).working
started_atNoISO 8601 timestamp when the run started
completed_atNoISO 8601 timestamp when the run reached a terminal state
error_messageNoError details when status is 'failed'
phase_historyNoTimeline of phase transitions for this run. Append-only; each entry records when a phase started and when it ended (null for the currently-running phase). Preserved after completion so the time distribution is auditable forever.
status_messageNoShort human-readable description of the current phase
last_heartbeat_atNoLast time the worker emitted any signal, including liveness heartbeats. Updated continuously while the run is working — independent of progress, which only advances on real phase transitions. Used by the UI to surface staleness when no signal has arrived in 10s+ (separates 'still alive but slow' from 'actually hung').
current_phase_started_atNoISO 8601 timestamp recording when the currently-active phase began. The UI derives the elapsed-time suffix in the status line from this — `now - current_phase_started_at`, recomputed every second client-side. This decouples display cadence from worker write cadence: the worker only updates this value on phase transitions (a stable input), the UI animates the display (the smooth output). Cleared on terminal transitions.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It does not disclose whether the tool is read-only, requires authentication, or has rate limits. The only behavioral hint is the ID format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with no wasted words. However, it could include additional context without being verbose, such as mentioning the tool is for single-record retrieval.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and a simple single-parameter input, the description is minimally adequate. It doesn't mention error handling or that it returns a single run, but the context is sufficient for basic use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value beyond the schema by noting that IDs start with 'rr_'. The schema already provides a detailed description, but the ID format note further clarifies parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it gets a research run by ID, which is unambiguous. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like delete_research_run that also operate by ID, though the verb 'get' implies retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like list_research_runs or search_research_runs. The description lacks context for appropriate use cases or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NimbleBrainInc/synapse-research'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server