Skip to main content
Glama
NimbleBrainInc

synapse-research

delete_research_run

Delete a research run by its ID; soft delete by default, or use hard=true to permanently remove.

Instructions

Delete a research_run by ID. Soft delete by default (sets status to 'deleted'). Set hard=true to permanently remove. IDs start with rr_.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hardNoPermanently remove instead of soft delete.
research_run_idYesresearch_run ID (rr_...)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYesThe research query or topic
titleNoShort human label for the run (3–8 words). Distinct from `query`, which holds the full research brief. Auto-generated server-side via the FAST_LLM shortly after the entity is created when not supplied by the caller. Renders in list rows and as the detail-view heading; the UI falls back to a truncated `query` while title is null.
reportNoThe final markdown report. Populated when status becomes 'completed'.
sourcesNoSources consulted during the research run. Populated incrementally during the 'Gathering sources' phase.
progressNoCompletion percent (0–100)
run_statusNoExecution status, mirrors the MCP task status for the underlying run. Distinct from the base entity `status` field which tracks lifecycle (active/archived/deleted).working
started_atNoISO 8601 timestamp when the run started
completed_atNoISO 8601 timestamp when the run reached a terminal state
error_messageNoError details when status is 'failed'
phase_historyNoTimeline of phase transitions for this run. Append-only; each entry records when a phase started and when it ended (null for the currently-running phase). Preserved after completion so the time distribution is auditable forever.
status_messageNoShort human-readable description of the current phase
last_heartbeat_atNoLast time the worker emitted any signal, including liveness heartbeats. Updated continuously while the run is working — independent of progress, which only advances on real phase transitions. Used by the UI to surface staleness when no signal has arrived in 10s+ (separates 'still alive but slow' from 'actually hung').
current_phase_started_atNoISO 8601 timestamp recording when the currently-active phase began. The UI derives the elapsed-time suffix in the status line from this — `now - current_phase_started_at`, recomputed every second client-side. This decouples display cadence from worker write cadence: the worker only updates this value on phase transitions (a stable input), the UI animates the display (the smooth output). Cleared on terminal transitions.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses the default soft delete behavior (status set to 'deleted'), the hard permanent delete option, and the ID prefix. It does not mention required permissions, rate limits, or cascading effects, but the core behavioral traits are well covered.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is three concise sentences with no redundancy. It front-loads the core purpose and then adds behavioral nuances efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no nested objects) and presence of an output schema, the description covers all necessary behavioral details: soft vs hard delete, default behavior, and ID format. It is adequately complete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds value by clarifying the 'hard' parameter's effect ('to permanently remove') and reiterating the ID prefix. This enriches the parameter meaning beyond schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Delete a research_run by ID', specifying both the action and resource. It also explains soft vs hard delete. Sibling tools are all non-destructive (get, list, search) or other actions (add_field, rebuild, start), so this tool's deletion purpose is distinct and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description implicitly indicates when to use (to delete a research_run) and explains default soft delete behavior. It does not explicitly exclude use cases or mention alternatives, but given sibling tools are read or other operations, the context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NimbleBrainInc/synapse-research'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server