Vector Decisions MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Vector Decisions MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides governed tools for evaluating proposed agent actions against policy, classifying risk, and creating structured governance and audit records, while pausing consequential steps for explicit human approval. This lets agentic workflows run under traceable, least-privilege control rather than unrestricted automation.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides policy-based access control, incident tracking, and compliance monitoring to govern AI agent behavior. It enables organizations to enforce security rules and maintain audit trails by validating agent actions against trust levels and pattern-based policies.61-

ERDL Guardofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policy decisions on AI agent tool calls, supporting allow, deny, correct, escalate, and human review actions with verifiable audit receipts.9 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables autonomous AI agents to operate safely by intercepting risky tool calls, evaluating them against policy, and suspending them for human approval via Slack, Telegram, or a web dashboard.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA pre-action authorization server for AI agents that classifies tool calls into 14 intent categories, scores risk 0-100, and produces deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions with full audit trail.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct concern: trust scoring, emergency halt, compliance, risk assessment, action assurance, and decision-making. While trust and risk are related, they are conceptually different (governance quality vs. deployment risk), and the assurance/decision pair forms a clear pipeline without overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb/noun structure (e.g., kill_switch, compliance_check, decide_action). The use of the 'gatri' prefix in gatri_trust_score is a minor deviation but doesn't break the consistency.
Six tools is well within the ideal range and maps cleanly to the server's governance/decision-making domain. Each tool adds unique capability without redundancy, and the count feels appropriately scoped.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: assessment (trust, risk, compliance), action-level assurance, decision output, and emergency control. Minor gaps exist, such as policy management or audit trail retrieval, but these are not essential to the primary workflow and can be worked around.