Skip to main content
Glama
NikitaDatar

Vector Decisions MCP Server

by NikitaDatar

Related Servers

Alternatives to Vector Decisions MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides policy-based access control, incident tracking, and compliance monitoring to govern AI agent behavior. It enables organizations to enforce security rules and maintain audit trails by validating agent actions against trust levels and pattern-based policies.
      6
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic policy decisions on AI agent tool calls, supporting allow, deny, correct, escalate, and human review actions with verifiable audit receipts.
      172 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A pre-action authorization server for AI agents that classifies tool calls into 14 intent categories, scores risk 0-100, and produces deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions with full audit trail.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with a transparent proxy and journal for every tool action, including pre-state snapshots and approval gates for risky operations. Enables per-action undo, rewind to a point in time, and a kill switch that agents cannot override.
      4 npm
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic policies on AI agent tool calls, evaluating actions against compliance modules (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and returning ALLOW, BLOCK, or CONSTRAIN decisions with an audit trail.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern: trust scoring, emergency halt, compliance, risk assessment, action assurance, and decision-making. While trust and risk are related, they are conceptually different (governance quality vs. deployment risk), and the assurance/decision pair forms a clear pipeline without overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb/noun structure (e.g., kill_switch, compliance_check, decide_action). The use of the 'gatri' prefix in gatri_trust_score is a minor deviation but doesn't break the consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal range and maps cleanly to the server's governance/decision-making domain. Each tool adds unique capability without redundancy, and the count feels appropriately scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: assessment (trust, risk, compliance), action-level assurance, decision output, and emergency control. Minor gaps exist, such as policy management or audit trail retrieval, but these are not essential to the primary workflow and can be worked around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues