Vector Decisions MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Vector Decisions MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.MIT- FlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides policy-based access control, incident tracking, and compliance monitoring to govern AI agent behavior. It enables organizations to enforce security rules and maintain audit trails by validating agent actions against trust levels and pattern-based policies.61-

ERDL Guardofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policy decisions on AI agent tool calls, supporting allow, deny, correct, escalate, and human review actions with verifiable audit receipts.172 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA pre-action authorization server for AI agents that classifies tool calls into 14 intent categories, scores risk 0-100, and produces deterministic allow/deny/ask decisions with full audit trail.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a transparent proxy and journal for every tool action, including pre-state snapshots and approval gates for risky operations. Enables per-action undo, rewind to a point in time, and a kill switch that agents cannot override.4 npmBusiness Source 1.1

Vaikora Guard MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnforces deterministic policies on AI agent tool calls, evaluating actions against compliance modules (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and returning ALLOW, BLOCK, or CONSTRAIN decisions with an audit trail.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct concern: trust scoring, emergency halt, compliance, risk assessment, action assurance, and decision-making. While trust and risk are related, they are conceptually different (governance quality vs. deployment risk), and the assurance/decision pair forms a clear pipeline without overlap.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb/noun structure (e.g., kill_switch, compliance_check, decide_action). The use of the 'gatri' prefix in gatri_trust_score is a minor deviation but doesn't break the consistency.
Six tools is well within the ideal range and maps cleanly to the server's governance/decision-making domain. Each tool adds unique capability without redundancy, and the count feels appropriately scoped.
The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: assessment (trust, risk, compliance), action-level assurance, decision output, and emergency control. Minor gaps exist, such as policy management or audit trail retrieval, but these are not essential to the primary workflow and can be worked around.