thealeph_query_ptr

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

As a query tool with no annotations, the description implies read-only behavior by using 'query'. However, it does not explicitly state side effects, failure modes, or rate limits. Adequate but minimal for a simple read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the key action and outcomes. No redundant or unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description covers what the tool does and the kind of data it returns. Lacks explicit mention that at least one parameter should be provided, but this is implied. Overall sufficient for a simple query tool without output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no additional insight beyond the schema, merely restating the overall purpose. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Query reverse DNS (PTR) records') and the type of intelligence retrieved (ASN, location, geo hints). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like thealeph_batch_query_ptr by implying single-query operation, and from other ASN-related tools by focusing on PTR records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., batch query, ASN hints). Does not mention required parameter combinations or prerequisites. Agent has no information about typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.