thealeph_asn_hints

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states that the tool 'gets' hints, implying a read operation, but does not mention any side effects, authentication requirements, rate limits, or what constitutes 'hints'. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact or constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundant information. However, it may be too brief to fully convey the tool's purpose and behavior, though it remains appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal. It does not explain what the returned 'hints' look like, how they differ from other ASN data, or what the agent can expect. This lack of completeness could lead to incorrect usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with a description for 'asn' ('Autonomous System Number'). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action 'Get' and the resource 'geographic and network hints for an ASN'. It clearly indicates the tool's purpose but does not differentiate it from siblings like 'thealeph_asn_classifications' or 'thealeph_asn_hint_mapping', which could confuse an agent about when to use this specific tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'thealeph_asn_classifications' or 'thealeph_asn_infrastructure_mapping'. The description lacks context that would help an agent decide, especially given the similar sibling tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.