Storage Umount

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose that this is a write operation and conditionally needs an admin password, which adds useful context, but it omits key consequences such as data access loss, reversibility, and what exactly gets unmounted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single concise sentence with the action front-loaded and zero wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core operation and the key caveat about admin password.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations, the description is minimal. It lacks usage guidance relative to sibling tools and omits behavioral consequences of unmounting. Although the schema and output schema cover parameters and returns, the sparse behavioral context leaves an agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all six parameters including uuid, host, port, scheme, profile, and admin_password are documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('卸载存储空间' = unmount storage space) clearly. However, it does not differentiate from sibling unmount tools like storage_disk_umount or from the mount counterparts, so an agent cannot tell which unmount to choose without inspecting schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives are given. It only notes it is a write operation and may require an admin password, but does not say when to use this versus storage_mount or storage_disk_umount, nor what prerequisites exist beyond the password condition.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.