App Store Latest Release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It implies a read-only fetch ('获取'), but discloses nothing about ordering, time window for 'latest', pagination, or authentication/session requirements — notable gaps given the host/port/profile session parameters.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence with zero filler and is front-loaded. But at this length it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise, leaving no room for the routing information an agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With four connection parameters, no annotations, and a large sibling set of overlapping store/listing tools, the description is too thin. An output schema exists so return values need not be described, but the absence of any differentiation or session context leaves the definition incomplete for correct selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (host, port, scheme, profile all documented), so the schema already carries parameter meaning. The description adds no additional parameter context, which matches the baseline 3 for high-coverage schemas.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('获取应用商店最新上架应用'), so the general intent is clear. However, it offers no differentiation from close siblings such as app_store_list, app_store_search, and app_store_detail — an agent cannot tell from this text why it would pick 'latest release' over those.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no mention of alternatives, and no prerequisites or exclusions. The agent is left to infer the distinction between this tool and the many other app_store_* and app_* listing tools purely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.