Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to usom-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides real-time threat intelligence for AI agents, enabling checks on IPs, domains, URLs, hashes, CVEs, prompt-injection payloads, and malicious AI-skill/MCP-tool definitions against a free database of 890K+ IOCs.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents threat-intelligence verdicts for IPs, domains, URLs and hashes, CVE lookups with EPSS and CISA KEV data, and a prompt-injection gate that scans untrusted text before the agent acts on it. Agents can also batch-check up to 100 indicators, hunt brand-lookalike domains, and track scan and request quotas.
      1
      203 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets AI agents and assistants check domains or links for safety before opening them, returning verdicts, risk scores, advice, and DNS resolution details through DNS-over-HTTPS.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and apps to check URLs, domains, IP addresses, phone numbers, emails, crypto wallets, IBANs, mobile apps, and payment handles for scam, phishing, and fraud risk, returning verdicts, probabilities, facts, and reason codes.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect a URL before opening, following, or recommending it, by tracing redirect chains via headers, stripping tracking parameters, detecting phishing-style URL tricks, and cross-checking threat-intel feeds to return a SAFE, SUSPICIOUS, or DANGEROUS verdict with supporting evidence. It also scans text for embedded and defanged links and vets agent skills prior to installation.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions or resource types: check_url, check_domain, and check_ip are well-separated, and the watch_* tools have distinct roles. search_threats and latest_threats overlap somewhat because latest_threats is a specialized recent-record query, but the descriptions make the intended use clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with predictable verb/noun or domain-prefixed patterns such as check_url, watch_add, and watch_list. The only minor outlier is stats, which is still readable and consistent with the overall style.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well-scoped for a USOM threat-intelligence and local watch-list server. Each tool covers a distinct lookup, monitoring, or watch-list operation without obvious redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers threat search, URL/domain/IP checks, recent records, stats, and full local watch-list lifecycle operations including add, remove, list, and check. This is complete for the apparent domain and supports common agent workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues