Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Substance Painter MCP

Substance Painter MCP

by MrReverso
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Substance Painter MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • substance-painter-mcp

      jwang47
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables conversational control of Adobe Substance 3D Painter for look-dev iteration, including baking, smart materials, and generator parameter tuning.
      MIT

    • Cinema4D MCP Server

      bernard4972
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to drive a 3D modeling application through natural-language prompts for scene creation, object modification, materials, lighting, animation, MoGraph, dynamics, and rendering.
      -

    • Painter MCP

      parodyband
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to observe, batch, script, recover, bake, and export Adobe Substance 3D Painter scenes through a Model Context Protocol server with specialist schemas and persistent tooling.
      2
      MIT

    • BlenderMCP

      IAmMarcellus
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude AI to directly control Blender for automated 3D modeling, scene creation, and object manipulation. It provides tools for material management, scene inspection, and integration with third-party asset libraries like Poly Haven and Sketchfab.
      10
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 86 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The domain is genuinely large, and most tools state a distinct target (e.g., set_fill_base_color vs set_fill_channels vs set_fill_parameters). However, several clusters overlap heavily — three capture_* tools, set_fill_projection vs set_fill_projection_advanced, insert_content_effect vs insert_mask_effect vs insert_smart_material, and apply_smart_mask vs set_layer_mask — forcing an agent to read long descriptions to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly everything follows a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, set_*, create_*, plan_*, start_*_job, get_*_job), which is predictable and readable. Minor deviations like painter_status (noun-first) and the mix of plan/start/get_job job-lifecycle verbs are the only friction.

    Tool Count1/5

    86 tools is far beyond what an agent can reliably navigate in one surface; the plan/start/get_job triples alone multiply the tool count considerably. This is an extreme mismatch for a single server, even given the breadth of Substance Painter.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is unusually thorough: project lifecycle, layers, masks, fills/generators, baking, mesh reload, export/import, resources, and job polling are all represented with verification and rollback. Gaps like undo/redo, texture-set creation, and resource deletion are minor workarounds rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources